今天很多布谷龙途小伙伴们都参加了雅思考试，我们名师何老师特地以今日雅思考题为大家汇总出题型及解题注意点。

接下来，小布带大家来看看雅思考题分析吧！

1.Anniversary

2.80

3.April

4.11.30

5.luxury

6.soup

7.rows

8.microphone

9.twin

10.bus

16.medication/tropical disease

17.mobile phone

18.bottled water

19.monkeys

20.seafood

31.frog

32.birds

33.corn

34.media

35.insects

36.fear

37.rivals

38.complex

39.plants

40.blood

小作文为柱状图十年间澳大利亚六个城市的水库水位变化（water level of reservoir）

参考：

The bar chart contains the frequency of resident in the USA at in fast food restaurants in the year of 2003, 2006 and 2013. As can be seen from the bar graph, most of the citizen will ate once a week between 2003 and 2013. 

According to the graph, the year of 2013 recorded the highest proportion of the frequency that resident ate in fast food once or twice a month (about 33% estimatedly) among six types of frequency, accounting for two times than the frequency of a few times a year. By contrast, the lowest rate of the frequency that the citizen in the usa ate fast food restaurants every day and never went on 2006 and 2013 which was 3% estimatedly.

Moreover, frequency of the people in usa ate fast food several times a week of the year 2003 (17% approximately)  was slightly lower than that of 2006 ( 20%). besides, the figures for 2006 and 2013 tend to be fairly similar in the resident who never ate in fast food restaurants.

学生例文 6.5分

大作文要求大家探讨纸质书在数字时代是否仍有存在的价值。

Time allocation：

Outline-4mins

P1-4mins

P2-14mins

P3-10mins

P4-2mins

Outline：

Oppose：

Printed books are do less harm to health

Immersive reading

Safe for keeping

Support：

Convenient 

Gain resource more efficiency

Easy to share

Subtotal:4mins

Outline2:

Books still important:

Printed books are do less harm to health

Immersive reading

Safe for keeping

Library are not necessary:

Gain resource more efficiency

Easy to share

Subtotal:2mins

Despite rapid strides in the prevalence of digital reading, some people consider libraries are not in need, which will drive a further consideration of whether the printed books are still essential or not around the globe. This issue will be closely examined in this essay.(4mins)

A 题目其一     B 分论点 100条

The harmlessness of printed books to personal health can never be exaggerated. Even though it is various E-books or multiple reading apps that are easy to change the background light, the harm of them are still more than the traditional paper books. Statistics investigating five thousand children reported by the life and health college of Chinese Academy of Sciences show that the children who use e-books to read for one hour have 50% ’s probability than those who read by paper book for an hour to harm eyesight. (8mins)

Besides, immersive reading cannot live without tangible books. It is not uncommon to believe that it is awfully easy to be drunk in real books. Reading tools can be divided into two groups in light of the diversity of the function, which means only can you read when you are reading a real book because of its single function, however, when we are using other tools such as e-books and reading apps, the readers, for instance, can be easily distracted by the variety of functions.(6mins)

Although paper books never fail to restore information in an absolutely safe way, digital books have an inborn advantage that is gaining resources extraordinarily efficient. When a reader intend to look for a series of books, the only thing he or she needs to do is searching in the digital resource library within several minutes rather than to do a lot of things in the real library.(4 mins)

So many benefits can traditional printed books bring to us that even though they are not recognized as an efficient way to gain reading resources or for sharing the feelings when we are reading, they can contribute to healthy life, the safe way for keeping information as well as building a bridge between knowledge and personal inside happiness.（3 mins）

学生作文 6.5分