With the successful conclusion of the first session, the event moved into the more core second session—training in test paper review sessions. Director Zhang Falin once again played a leading role, elaborating on the key elements of conducting an excellent test paper review session around the four principles of "timeliness, motivation, pertinence, and expansiveness."
Step 1: Feedback Information, Error Rate Statistics
Director Zhang pointed out that timely collection and feedback of students' exam information is the foundation of a review session. He recommended various methods such as listing, marking, and statistical charts to help teachers quickly calculate error rates and identify teaching priorities. For example, using the listing method to detail the number of students who made errors on each question, marking error types with different colors, or utilizing statistical charts to visually display error distributions, enabling teachers to grasp students' mastery at a glance.
Step 2: Analyze and Reflect on Error Causes and Types
After obtaining the data, Director Zhang emphasized the importance of in-depth analysis of error causes and types. He encouraged teachers to not only focus on the superficial phenomena of errors but also delve deeper into the underlying reasons, such as unclear understanding of knowledge points, lack of problem-solving skills, and poor reading habits. Through group discussions and case analyses, teachers jointly explored solutions, providing a scientific basis for determining subsequent review content.
Step 3: Determine Review Content
Based on the analysis of the first two steps, Director Zhang guided teachers in determining review content. He emphasized that review sessions should not only correct errors but also stimulate students' thinking and exploratory spirit. Therefore, teachers should design explanation strategies around high-frequency error points while paying attention to expanding related knowledge to enhance students' comprehensive abilities. Through various forms such as example explanations, group discussions, and role-playing, review sessions become a stage for teacher-student interaction and knowledge collision.